Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Identities Collection
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
  • Identities Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • About Our Blog
    • Blog Categories >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Symposium
      • More Blogs
    • Blog Series >
      • COVID-19 Blog Collection
      • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events >
      • Fireside Chat with Prof Nicola Rollock
    • Past Events >
      • Race and Class
      • W. E. B. Du Bois and his Strange Synthesis of Spirituality and Sociology
      • Decolonizing Politics Symposium
      • The Subject of Decolonization: Literary Critical Insights
  • Contact
    • Subscribe for Updates
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Identities Collection
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
  • Identities Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • About Our Blog
    • Blog Categories >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Symposium
      • More Blogs
    • Blog Series >
      • COVID-19 Blog Collection
      • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events >
      • Fireside Chat with Prof Nicola Rollock
    • Past Events >
      • Race and Class
      • W. E. B. Du Bois and his Strange Synthesis of Spirituality and Sociology
      • Decolonizing Politics Symposium
      • The Subject of Decolonization: Literary Critical Insights
  • Contact
    • Subscribe for Updates

Utopia, overdetermination and ethnographic writing in Chile

2/6/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Image credit: Carlos Figueroa, CC BY-SA 4.0.
While writing our Identities article, ‘Disjunctive belongings and the utopia of intimacy: violence, love and friendship among poor urban youth in neoliberal Chile’, we had already started to witness a series of protests that recently culminated in the so-called Chilean ‘social outburst’ in October 2019 and the current process building a constituent assembly. Issues of quality of education, environmental concerns, shortcomings in the social security system, as well as long-standing efforts for the cultural and political recognition of indigenous groups gained increasing support over time. Yet, the many protests still appeared geographically scattered, and while people in the urban margins indeed felt uneasy with their life prospects, it was still uncommon to hear people articulate a more thorough critique of the neoliberal model that has prevailed in Chile for the past forty years.
​
In Los Acantos, the residents we met in 2012–2013 were conscious of these issues. Many of the young residents we met saw no way out in a world bounded off by invisible borders of social (in)difference and stigma. People were, in other words, aware of their almost impossible odds of socio-economic mobility and underneath the surface of monotonous low-income houses, the attentive ethnographer could feel the discontent. 
Analysing how young people inhabited those social realities, we developed the concept of ‘disjunctive belonging’. We did not want to describe our interlocutors as situated ‘outside’ of social order. We wanted to make sense of the struggles and possibilities that young residents in Los Acantos saw whilst dwelling in place in which social relationships were structured by the ever possibility of violent outbursts, scant of opportunities for upward mobility, and the incentives of a parallel – and more profitable – drug economy. We saw how our interlocutors’ experiences were informed by a sense of paralysis and feeling stuck in their impossibility to imagine and act upon the future. ‘A life built upon accidents’ was how one young interlocutor brilliantly summarised it for us. But still, the all-invading experience prevailed. Reality as it is could not be changed: we would not only need to ‘simply’ have to adapt to the imperfect neoliberal democracy that had replaced a horrendous dictatorship. The urban poor (and other marginalised groups) would have to carry the burden and the shame of not fulfilling their part as successful citizens in the ‘Chilean miracle’.

Struck by the seeming obligation to endure rather than flourish, we sought to understand the lateral movements people would make to dream and actualise a precarious, virtual version of themselves that could be more satisfying for themselves. Participants used the neoliberal rhetoric of wilfulness to make sense of the cases in which some ‘exceptional people’ could remove themselves from the neighbour's self-perpetuating dynamics and move on. We understood this in terms of the neoliberal logic of ‘pulling yourself by the bootstraps’ that has informed social mobility dreams across the Americas. Writing the ethnography, we tried to let these subtle tensions shine through. And yet, there was something in the making that we can only see from the hindsight.

The years 2019 and 2020 saw Chile shaking again with an intense, sometimes violent, and large-scale mobilisation. Chileans’ multiple discontents with ‘the model’ were coalescing. Many people in Chile were euphoric and the protesters chanted over and over again that ‘Chile has awakened’. After months of protests, a parliamentary agreement was reached to change the country's political constitution – one that had been designed during the military dictatorship almost 50 years ago and merely amended since then. In a referendum, millions of people turned up to show overwhelming support for the option to start a participatory process of decision-making from scratch; a process whose outcomes will need to be later ratified in a second popular vote. The suspense we feel about the unfolding of this story leads us to end with a short reflection on ethnographic writing.

When writing the conclusion of our Identities article for a special issue dedicated to the topic of youth and utopia, Ignacia, as an early career researcher and co-author, struggled to understand where hope lied therein. Yet, we had to embrace the theme; it was at the core of the special issue. Helene then suggested adopting what Ignacia remembers as ‘the fishtail model’ in which the article's conclusion did not need to be tight but could open itself to other possibilities and potential readings of the present. The rationale behind the ‘fishtail model’ was, according to Helene, that we did not need to foreclose the unfolding of people's worlds in our writing. Los Acantos residents' attempts to humanise their worlds were still utopian: there were trying to live otherwise.

Hanging on the idea of an open fishtail, we finished revising the article hoping that the experiences of those living in the Acantos could be re-written too. We tried to remain open and recognise the simmering language of social critique and its potential for social transformation. We wanted to give some credit to a politics of care that goes beyond the fragile illusion of individual realisation through romantic love. Maybe now, while the entry-point referendum has been supported, we might be able to undo some of the ‘social debt’ undermining the Chilean poor. But again, we can only end with a ‘fishtail’ at this point, hopeful but also painfully aware of the limits. Neither will the historic criminalisation of the poor be swiped away overnight, nor will the very real structural and criminal violence that affect their lives vanish ‘just’ because a new constitution. Yet, we dare to hope because people have dared. We leave it open, trying to not over-determine what is at stake.   

Blog post by Ignacia Arteaga, Cambridge University, UK and Helene Risør, Universidad Católica de Chile​, Chile

Read the full article: Arteaga Pérez, Ignacia & Risør, Helene. Disjunctive belongings and the utopia of intimacy: violence, love and friendship among poor urban youth in neoliberal Chile. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2017.1400278
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Blog Categories

    All
    Activism
    Anti-racism
    Asylum Seekers
    Belonging
    Black Lives Matter
    Blackness
    Borders
    Boundary Work
    Cities
    Citizenship
    Colonialism
    Commentaries
    Conflict
    Cosmopolitanism
    Covid-19
    Cultural Memory
    Culture
    Decoloniality
    Diaspora
    Discrimination
    Displacement
    Diversity
    Ethnic Boundaries
    Ethnic Identity
    Ethnicity
    Exile
    Far Right
    Gender
    Global South
    Identity
    Immigration
    Indigenous
    Integration
    Intersectionality
    Islamophobia
    Justice
    Kinship
    Marginalisation
    Migration
    Multiculturalism
    National Identity
    Nationalism
    Nationhood
    Nativism
    Othering
    Policing
    Populism
    Postcolonial
    Race
    Racial Identity
    Racialisation
    Racism
    Radicalism
    Refugees
    Religion
    Resistance
    State Racism
    Stereotyping
    Stigmatisation
    Subjectivity
    Transnationalism
    Victimhood
    Whiteness


    Blog Collection

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE