Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues >
      • Call for Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
    • Submit to Identities
  • Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • Blogs by Topic >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • More Blog Topics
    • Blog Series >
      • Gaza and Solidarity Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Submit to the Blog
  • Podcast
    • The Identities Podcast >
      • Listen on Spotify
      • Listen on SoundCloud
  • Events
    • Next Events
    • Recorded Events
  • Contact
    • Contact Identities
    • Keep in touch >
      • The Identities Newsletter
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues >
      • Call for Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
    • Submit to Identities
  • Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • Blogs by Topic >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • More Blog Topics
    • Blog Series >
      • Gaza and Solidarity Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Submit to the Blog
  • Podcast
    • The Identities Podcast >
      • Listen on Spotify
      • Listen on SoundCloud
  • Events
    • Next Events
    • Recorded Events
  • Contact
    • Contact Identities
    • Keep in touch >
      • The Identities Newsletter

Pro-diversity politics: the merging of approaches

26/4/2023

 
Picture
Recent UK Home Secretaries have condemned the toppling of a slave trader statue in Bristol, dismissed footballers taking the knee as ‘gesture politics’ and called on police forces to spend less time on diversity and inclusion initiatives. Yet between 2010, when the Conservatives came into power, and 2020, the overall policy framework remained broadly favourable to multiculturalism: accommodations are still made for ethno-religious dress, the BBC has retained its mandate to reflect diversity, and funding is available for ethnic organisations.

With respect to immigration, there has been a closer connection between harsh rhetoric and restrictive measures, exemplified by the multiplication of immigration checks, the end of free movement with the EU, the housing of asylum seekers in inadequate and overcrowded military barracks and the on-going attempt to deport some to Rwanda. At the policy level, therefore, efforts to include racialized citizens seem to have become disconnected from the opening of the country to foreign nationals.

Shift the focus from the Government to minority ethnic and anti-racist organisations, however, and the picture starts to look quite different. In September last year the Muslim Council of Britain echoed a report from the Institute of Race Relations denouncing how British Muslims were disproportionately affected by the citizenship deprivation powers reinforced through the Nationality & Borders Act 2022. The Runnymede Trust, a leading race equality think tank, has published a number of blog posts denouncing deportations and asylum-seekers’ woeful living conditions, partly due to the denial of their right to work and access public funds. Similar claims have been raised by Voice4Change, an advocate for the Black and minority ethnic voluntary sector.
As we show in our recent Identities article, ‘The relation between multiculturalism, interculturalism and cosmopolitanism in UK diversity politics’, these interventions are not exceptional but part of a deeper intertwining  of multiculturalist, interculturalist and cosmopolitan ideas. Often set against each other in academic and political discourse, these three philosophical traditions nonetheless share a positive orientation toward cultural diversity and a commitment to combatting discrimination on the grounds of race, ethnicity and religion.

Given the current strength of far-right populist parties and movements across Western societies, it therefore seems pertinent to explore the potential for theoretical and practical reconciliation between them. To address this question, we interviewed the leaders or influential members of 17 organisations representing ethnic minorities or otherwise championing racial equality and social cohesion. We also paid close attention to the latest national policy statement on these issues, Integrated Communities, published in 2018, as well as other documentary sources.

Our research reveals that at least two fault lines found in the philosophical literature are regularly bridged in UK policy and civil society claims. The first, as suggested above, is the assumed dilemma between facilitating movement and promoting inclusive forms of citizenship. While the organisations interviewed were divided on the desirability of EU-style open borders, there was broad consensus on the need to do more for asylum seekers. Instead of seeing this as a threat to national cohesion, respondents highlighted how toxic narratives around refugees and migration in general had fuelled racism against established communities too.

The second cleavage has to do with the perceived legitimacy of different levels of governance when it comes to dealing with cultural diversity. Whereas multiculturalist theorists tend to focus on national institutions, interculturalist ones on local authorities and cosmopolitan ones on supra-national bodies, civil society did not make such clear-cut distinctions. For instance, Muslim Engagement and Development highlighted various initiatives against Islamophobia developed by the EU pre-Brexit (admittedly, following the steer of the UK itself), and several respondents considered that national-level funding should continue to support intergroup contact, a key interculturalist principle.

​Whether these emerging syntheses will eventually lead to coherent and politically effective pro-diversity coalitions in the UK and beyond remains to be determined.

Image credit: Photo by Belinda Fewings on Unsplash

Blog post by Pier-Luc Dupont, Thomas Sealy and Tariq Modood, University of Bristol Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship, UK

Read the Identities article:
Dupont, Pier-Luc, Sealy, Thomas and Modood, Tariq. (2023). The relation between multiculturalism, interculturalism and cosmopolitanism in UK diversity politics. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2023.2186622   OPEN ACCESS
Picture
Read further in Identities:

Cosmopolitanism and integrationism: is British multiculturalism a ‘Zombie category’?

Diversity as discourse and diversity as practice: critical reflections on migrant women’s experiences of accessing mental health support in London

The governmentality of multiculturalism: from national pluri-ethnicity to urban cosmopolitanism in Bogotá   OPEN ACCESS

Comments are closed.


    Explore the 
    Identities Blog

    All
    Activism
    Anti Racism
    Anti-racism
    Asylum Seekers
    Belonging
    Black Lives Matter
    Blackness
    Borders
    Boundary Work
    Cities
    Citizenship
    Colonialism
    Commentaries
    Conflict
    Cosmopolitanism
    Covid-19
    Cultural Memory
    Culture
    Decoloniality
    Diaspora
    Discrimination
    Displacement
    Diversity
    Ethnic Boundaries
    Ethnic Identity
    Ethnicity
    Exile
    Far Right
    Gaza And Solidarity
    Gender
    Global South
    Identity
    Immigration
    Indigenous
    Integration
    Intersectionality
    Islamophobia
    Justice
    Kinship
    Marginalisation
    Migration
    Multiculturalism
    National Identity
    Nationalism
    Nationhood
    Nativism
    Othering
    Palestine
    Policing
    Populism
    Postcolonial
    Race
    Racial Identity
    Racialisation
    Racism
    Radicalism
    Refugees
    Religion
    Resistance
    Special Issues
    Sport
    State Racism
    Stereotyping
    Stigmatisation
    Subjectivity
    Transnationalism
    Victimhood
    Whiteness


    Blog Collection

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

Picture

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE

Bluesky: @identitiesjournal.bsky.social
The views and opinions expressed on The Identities Blog are solely those of the original blog post authors, and not of the journal, Taylor & Francis Group or the University of Glasgow.