Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Global South Authors
    • Identities Collection
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
  • Identities Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • Blog Categories >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Symposium
      • More Blogs
    • About Our Blog
  • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • COVID-19 Blog Collection
    • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • Events
    • The Subject of Decolonization: Literary Critical Insights
  • Contact
    • Subscribe for Updates
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Global South Authors
    • Identities Collection
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
  • Identities Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • Blog Categories >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Symposium
      • More Blogs
    • About Our Blog
  • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • COVID-19 Blog Collection
    • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • Events
    • The Subject of Decolonization: Literary Critical Insights
  • Contact
    • Subscribe for Updates

Balancing impact with integrity as a migration scholar

6/1/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Photo from the launch of a research report on human trafficking from Nigeria to Europe in 2007 of May-Len Skilbrei (left) and the then Norwegian Minister of Justice, Knut Storberget. Photo credit: Heiko Junge / NTB.
In my 20 years of doing research that is framed either directly or indirectly by Norwegian authorities, I have come to the conclusion that even, or maybe especially, in Norway where there are close links and allegiances between research and government and where the shared assumption often is that ‘we all want what’s best for people’, there are considerable risks when scholars aim to produce research that is intended to be relevant to stakeholders and society.

In order to get funding and recognition, researchers are subjected to demands to do research in a way that is explicitly relevant to society in the short run. Such short-term relevance is also valued within research institutions and among researchers, and the evaluation of research often uses ‘impact’ as a marker for quality. The value of being relevant is heralded in many contexts, but the drive to be relevant may be problematic as this creates a situation where it may be difficult to steer free of becoming embedded in administrative or political agendas. I have experienced politicians and bureaucrats staying at an arm’s length distance to ensure the independence of my research, but I also have experience with meddling, threats and disappointment.

In my Identities article, ‘Taking on the categories, terms and worldviews of the powerful: the pitfalls of trying to be relevant’, I describe some such experiences. Much of my experience as a researcher is as a migration scholar; migration is a field that rapidly moved from the margins to the centre of both society and social science scholarship in the last ten years. This mandates that we have to think about what that entails for the framing and need for our research, but also for our practices and ability to take a critical position in our own work.
We have seen an emergence of an expectation that migration researchers will help to solve ‘the problem of migration’, something that points to an understanding of research as part of the processes of policymaking and implementation. Researchers are expected to document the functioning of migration management as if it is a type of machinery that can be improved if one tightens the right bolts. How can we as researchers carve out a role that moves us beyond handing over evidence and management tools to powerful institutions?

Arguing that seeking to produce knowledge that matters to powerful institutions and agendas holds some risks that warrant caution and solidarity amongst researchers is not the same as encouraging resorting to pure academic acrobatics that make what we do irrelevant and illegitimate. The reference to Ikarus in the title of this blog article is a reference to researchers’ precarious situation, much like the mythical figure Icarus who had to avoid flying too close to the sun because the heat would melt his wings, but who also had to avoid flying too low because he needed the heat from the sun to keep his wings working. To avoid hubris is to not fall into the trap of becoming merely a servant to the state, while avoiding becoming irrelevant to the powers that be.

The key to producing knowledge that moves thinking beyond the perspectives of powerful institutions and agendas is not distance, but the use of theory and contextualisation in a critical fashion. One example is that we challenge contemporary understandings of migration as an exception by refusing to do our research in a way that reifies how migration is compartmentalised, and instead bring migration into a broader context and treat it as a social phenomenon on par with others.

Blog post by May-Len Skilbrei, University of Oslo, Norway

Read the full article: Skilbrei, May-Len. Taking on the categories, terms and worldviews of the powerful: the pitfalls of trying to be relevant. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2020.1805884
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Blog Categories

    All
    Activism
    Anti-racism
    Asylum Seekers
    Belonging
    Blackness
    Boundary Work
    Cities
    Citizenship
    Colonialism
    Commentaries
    Conflict
    Cosmopolitanism
    Covid-19
    Cultural Memory
    Culture
    Decoloniality
    Diaspora
    Discrimination
    Displacement
    Diversity
    Ethnic Boundaries
    Ethnic Identity
    Ethnicity
    Exile
    Far Right
    Gender
    Identity
    Immigration
    Indigenous
    Integration
    Intersectionality
    Islamophobia
    Justice
    Kinship
    Marginalisation
    Migration
    Multiculturalism
    National Identity
    Nationalism
    Nationhood
    Othering
    Policing
    Populism
    Postcolonial
    Race
    Racial Identity
    Racialisation
    Racism
    Radicalism
    Refugees
    Religion
    Resistance
    State Racism
    Stereotyping
    Stigmatisation
    Subjectivity
    Transnationalism
    Victimhood
    Whiteness

    Blog Collection

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE