Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • COVID-19 Symposium
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • COVID-19 Symposium
  • Contact

How can you transcend a taboo and build a family?

12/2/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Social categories establish group boundaries, and also may become obstacles to social interaction and contact between groups. In intimate relationships such as marriage and family, taboos may arise upon historically and socially constituted categories.  

Intermarriage confronts these taboos: how individuals transcend social boundaries and create another 'us' through their strong relationships and strategies to deal with social oppression and prejudice. Intermarriage also has the potential to enhance social contacts between different groups, to solve group discontents, to question identity, group boundaries, prejudices and stereotypes, and to lead to more integrated societies.

In the Turkish context, Alevi and Sunni intermarriages are a good example of how group boundaries can be blurred, and how categories intersect with different political standings and worldviews, gendered systems and subjective positions. 

From 2014 to 2017, I led a research project to investigate intermarriage between people from the Alevi and Sunni communities in the city of Izmir on the western coast of Turkey. The project aimed to investigate, using qualitative research, how contact between different communities can be built and sustained through the marriage of two individuals. However, I found that even the definitions of groups, social categories and people’s understandings of their identifications were contestable. Therefore, it is crucial to examine how self and group identifications are constructed, negotiated or transformed in marriages in relation to their broader contexts. There were four key questions in our research: How do the partners in intermarriages define their family background categories (in this example, Sunniness and Aleviness)? How do they identify in relation to these categories? How do they perceive differences between these categories, themselves and their spouses? How do they construct a ‘we’ within and/or beyond these categories? 

My Identities article, 'Creating a ‘we’ between categories: social categories and Alevi-Sunni intermarriages', presents my findings on Alevi-Sunni intermarriages in the city of Izmir, Turkey. The article describes how Alevi and Sunni partners identify their Aleviness and Sunniness in relation to historical backgrounds of these categories in Turkey and current political discourses, as well as their own subjective positions. Their identifications and perceptions of differences reveal blurred group boundaries, processes of transcending the categories in their very particular experience of 'us', and traces of local and global reflections on these identity categories. I explain how partners in Alevi-Sunni intermarriages recognise differences between Sunniness and Aleviness, how they define these categories and identify themselves in relation to them, and how their marriage influences their identifications.

Spouses’ shared experiences of their relationship with each other and their corresponding communities can make both themselves and their social environment think more deeply about pre-defined identities and categories. This can also cause dissonances with former categorisations and create either modified or totally novel identifications. Whether of Sunni or Alevi backgrounds, spouses redefine categories and situate themselves and their partners as a 'we' within their re-identifications along with their sociopolitical, local and global representations.
Blog post by Gül Özateşler-Ülkücan, Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey
​
Read the full article: Özateşler-Ülkücan, Gül. Creating a ‘we’ between categories: social categories and Alevi-Sunni intermarriages. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2019.1627069
0 Comments

International marriage in Japan: Russian-speaking women and Japanese men

25/12/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
When people hear that my research topic is international marriages, a spark lights up their eyes, quickly followed by the comment, ‘Oh, living with a foreigner must be difficult...’ When I ask, ‘Why do you think so?’, people quickly answer with ‘cultural differences’, but pushing further, language differences is also mentioned as one of the biggest issues that concern people. So, what is it about language and culture that make it difficult for people to understand each other? Don’t we all have different cultures? Will knowing a spouse’s language help? Is there anything else that makes it difficult for people to connect and understand each other?
 
Having those and many other questions in mind, I conducted my research on marriages of Russian-speaking women from former Soviet Union countries, who live in Japan and are married to Japanese men. I did not intentionally ask participants to talk about differences in customs or ways of living, but no matter what we discussed, the conversation would eventually reveal how spouses experienced and compared each other’s languages and cultures.
 
My Identities article, ‘International marriage in Japan: reconstructing cultural toolkits in marriages between Japanese men and women from the former Soviet Union’, introduces the voices of Russian-speaking wives and Japanese husbands, and explores their thoughts about marriages and culture. I analyse some of my participants’ remarks about their communication with spouses, such as Lyubov, who described the way she talked with her husband:
 
Well, now [we speak] in Japanese, but it happens on very rare occasions, because we are ‘ideal Japanese family’, where everybody lives in their own space. We barely talk, only about children and whether there is enough money for living. That is more or less it.
 
I was wondering how this is an ‘ideal Japanese family’, when in another interview, another participant, Alexandra, said:
 
I don’t bother him [her Japanese husband] with every little thing anymore: when he forgets to turn off the light, or doesn’t clean the sink after shaving… I do it ‘like a Japanese woman’, [silently] clean it after him. He must have felt horrible in the first year of our marriage…
 
Why does doing things silently or not talking to a husband seem to be interpreted as an ‘ideal Japanese family’ or ‘ideal Japanese wife’? How did they come up with these images? How is an ‘ideal family’ different from the ‘ideal Japanese family’? And, what do Japanese husbands think about their marriages with these women?
 
I respond to these questions by analysing how women from former Soviet Union countries and their Japanese husbands think of and use culture in their everyday lives. In my analysis, I utilise Ann Swidler’s (1986) concept of culture shaping, a repertoire or ‘toolkit’ from which people construct ‘strategies of action’. Women in international marriages faced the burden of recognising their original cultural repertoire and the need to reshape it to create new strategies of action to fit into the life in Japan. On the other hand, their husbands lived in familiar environments outside the family, but had to deal with different ideals and customs inside their international marriages.

​Thus, the correctness of husbands’ cultural strategies was reinforced by the Japanese society, while they had to negotiate cultural differences inside the international family. Having different social and cultural backgrounds, Japanese husbands and Russian-speaking wives had difficulties performing roles as their spouses expected. Their perceptions of marriage and customs differed, and therefore the rules they followed in the relationships were different and could lead to conflict. For this reason, it was important to analyse how international couples navigated and restructured their toolkits, and what values shaped their new strategies of action.
 
I hope my research sheds light not only on the many facets of such seemingly simple notions as ‘family’ and ‘marriage’, but also provides readers with an insight into how spouses in international marriages rationalise these differences; the way in which they change or persist in their habits; and how their ideas evolve and grow with new understanding.
 
Reference:
Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review 51: 273–286. 
Blog post by Viktoriya Kim, Osaka University, Japan
 
Read the full article: Kim, Viktoriya. International marriage in Japan: reconstructing cultural toolkits in marriages between Japanese men and women from the former Soviet Union. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2019.1677325​
0 Comments

    Blog Collection

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

    Blog Categories

    All
    Academic Freedom
    Activism
    Adolescents
    Adoption
    Affective Solidarity
    Affirmative Action
    African-American
    African Caribbean Self Help Organisation (ACSHO)
    African Diaspora
    AKP
    Aleviness
    Alternative Epistemologies
    Alternative Futures
    Anarchists Against The Wall
    Anthropology
    Antiblackness
    Anti-racism
    Apartheid
    Archives
    Armenians
    Arts
    Aspirations
    Assimilation
    Asylum Seekers
    Australia
    BAME
    Becoming
    Belonging
    Biographical Trajectories
    Biologisation
    Black
    Black Geographies
    Blackness
    Body
    Bosnia-Herzegovina
    Boundary Work
    Boxing
    Brazil
    British Muslims
    Bushfalling
    Cameroon
    Canada
    Capital
    Capitalism
    Caregiver
    Categories
    Causal Stories
    Central Americans
    Chernobyl
    Children
    Children Of Immigrants
    China
    Chinatown
    Chinese Community
    Chinese Immigrants
    Chinese-Indonesian Women
    Citizenship
    Class
    CLR James
    Cognitive Justice
    Colombia
    Colonial
    Colonialism
    Commemoration
    Competitive
    Conflict
    Containment
    Context
    Cosmologies
    Cosmopolitanism
    Counter-mapping
    COVID-19
    Creole
    Critical Race Theory
    Cross-border Marriage
    Cross-national Comparison
    Cultural Geography
    Cultural Policy
    Cultural Scripts
    Cultural Studies
    Cultural Toolkit
    Culture Of Migration
    Curfew
    Decolonial Solidarity
    Decolonisation
    Denial
    Denmark
    Deportation
    Diaspora
    Digital
    Disaster
    Discourse
    Discourse Analysis
    Discrimination
    Displacement
    Diversity
    Divorce
    Domari
    Domestic Violence
    East Jerusalem
    Eating
    Educational Mobility
    Elite Students
    Emotion
    Employment
    Epistemology
    Ethnic Boundaries
    Ethnic Classification
    Ethnic Identity
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity And The City
    Ethnicization
    Ethnic Labelling
    Ethnic Minority
    Ethnic Niche
    Ethnic Websites
    Ethnoracial
    Ethnoracial Identity
    Europe
    European Capital Of Culture
    Exile
    Expatriates
    Experiential Knowledge
    Expert Role
    Explicit Normativity
    Exploitation
    Expropriation
    Faith Identities
    Family
    Fandom
    Far Right
    Favela
    Filipina
    Filipino
    Filipinos
    Flanders
    Food
    Football
    Fractal Logic
    France
    Fundamental British Values
    Gender
    Global Neo-colonialism
    ‘gün’ Groups
    Gypsy
    Handsworth Epistemologies
    Hauntology
    Hegemony
    Henri Lefebvre
    Higher Education
    Historical Enquiry
    Hmong
    Hong Kong
    Hospitality
    Humanism
    Humanitarianism
    Human Rights
    Hybridity
    Identification
    Identity
    Ideology
    Imaginaries
    Immigrants
    Immigration
    Immobility
    Impact
    Imperialism
    Implicit Normativity
    Inclusion
    Incorporation
    India Israel Relations
    India-Israel Relations
    Indigenous
    Indonesian Women
    Institutions
    Integration
    Intercultural Communication
    Interdisciplinary
    Interest Convergence
    Intermarriage
    Intermarriages
    International Marriage
    Intersectionality
    Interviews
    Intimate Citizenship
    Invisible Boundaries
    Ireland
    Islam
    Islamophobia
    Italy
    Japan
    Jewishness
    Joint Struggle
    Journeys
    Justice
    Kashmir
    Kinning
    Kinship
    Knowledge
    Knowledge Production
    Korea
    Labour Agency
    Labour Market
    Labour Migration
    Language
    Laowai
    Latin America
    Latinos
    Law
    Legal Discourse
    Liberalism
    Local Identity
    Los Angeles
    Mapuche
    Mariana Islands
    Marriage
    Marriage Migration
    Marseille
    Marxism
    Masculinity
    Media
    Mental Health Services
    Microaggression
    Micronesia
    Middle Class
    Migrant Entrepreneurs
    Migrant Farm Workers
    Migrants
    Migrant Women
    Migrant Workers
    Migration
    Migration Research
    Military Occupation
    Mixed-ethnicity
    Moralities
    Motherhood
    Movement
    Multicultural
    Multiculturalism
    Multiethnic
    Muslim
    Narrative
    Narratives
    Nation
    National Identity
    Nation In Danger
    Nation-state
    Neighbourhood Arts
    Neoliberalism
    Neonationalism
    NGOs
    Nicaragua
    Nigeria
    Nigerian Identities
    Non-governmental Organisations
    Normativity
    Northern Mariana Islands
    Norway
    Nostalgia
    Occidentalism
    Okinawa
    Orientalism
    Othering
    Palestine
    Palestine Israel
    Palestine-Israel
    Parenting
    Peace
    Performativity
    Place
    Place Branding
    Place-making
    Poetry
    Poland
    Policy
    Policy Analysis
    Political Subjectivity
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Populism
    Post-apartheid
    Postcolonial
    Postcolonial Theory
    Post-war
    Power
    Precarious Status
    Protests
    Public Inquiries
    Public Sociology
    Race
    Race-relations
    Racial Capitalism
    Racial Identity
    Racialisation
    Racialization
    Racial Schemas
    Racism
    Reconciliation
    Refugees
    Religion
    Remittances
    Representations
    Research
    Research Communication
    Research-policy Nexus
    Riace
    Rights Claims
    Role Identity
    Russian Women
    Science Studies
    Scientific Misconduct
    Second-generation
    Securitization
    Self-identification
    Self-victimisation
    Settler Colonialism
    Shame
    Silence
    Singapore
    Sixth Pan-African Congress
    Social Contact
    Social Exclusion
    Social Identity
    Social Relations
    Social Space
    Solidarity
    South Africa
    Sports
    State
    State Power
    State Racism
    Stereotyping
    Stigma
    Stuart Hall
    Student-worker
    Subjectivity
    Sunniness
    Sweden
    Sydney
    Syrian Refugees
    Temporality
    Third Sector
    Third Sector Organisations
    Threat Perception
    Transculturalism
    Transnationalism
    Transnational Racialization
    Travel
    Turkey
    Turks
    Uprising
    Urban Ethnography
    Urban Multiculturalism
    Urban Space
    Vanley Burke
    Victimhood
    Vulnerability
    Walking
    West Bank Separation Wall
    White Nationalism
    Whiteness
    White Sociology
    Women
    Words
    Worker Exit
    Working Class
    Youth

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE