Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues >
      • Call for Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
    • Submit to Identities
  • Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • Blogs by Topic >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • More Blog Topics
    • Blog Series >
      • Gaza and Solidarity Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Submit to the Blog
  • Podcast
    • The Identities Podcast >
      • Listen on Spotify
      • Listen on SoundCloud
  • Events
    • Next Events
    • Recorded Events
  • Contact
    • Contact Identities
    • Keep in touch >
      • The Identities Newsletter
  • Home
  • About
    • About Identities
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues >
      • Call for Special Issues
    • Open Access Articles
    • Most Read Articles
    • Most Cited Articles
    • Submit to Identities
  • Blog
    • Blog Collection
    • Blogs by Topic >
      • Anti-racism
      • Culture
      • Decoloniality
      • Ethnicity
      • Migration
      • Race
      • Commentaries
      • More Blog Topics
    • Blog Series >
      • Gaza and Solidarity Blog Series
      • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Submit to the Blog
  • Podcast
    • The Identities Podcast >
      • Listen on Spotify
      • Listen on SoundCloud
  • Events
    • Next Events
    • Recorded Events
  • Contact
    • Contact Identities
    • Keep in touch >
      • The Identities Newsletter

The proximity of the ‘far’ right

11/6/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Blog post by Liam Gillespie, University of Melbourne, Australia
 
It is often said that we are living in a period characterized by the ‘main-streaming’ of the far right. The idea is that the previously unacceptable ‘fringes’ of society – the literally ‘far’ right – have come to increasingly occupy and influence the mainstream or ‘centre’ of society, effectively becoming part of it. Commonly cited indicators for this idea include the return – and indeed in some cases the re-election – of political figures like Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, Marine Le Pen, Viktor Orbán, Giorgia Meloni, Javier Milei and Geert Wilders, all of whom have successfully tapped into and normalized racism, ethnic nationalism, xenophobia, misogyny, transphobia (and more) to achieve political success.
 
Consequently, research on the far right is booming, and much of the emerging literature now attempts to understand how and why the far right has come to be mainstreamed and normalized.
While much of this work is vital, in my Identities article, ‘On the proximity of the far right and the misuses of the ‘mainstreaming’ metaphor’, I critically analyze some of the (unintended) effects of the mainstreaming explanation. I suggest that the mainstreaming framework can sometimes work ideologically to obscure the very conditions of possibility that have allowed the far right to seem to emerge.
 
I suggest that the mainstreaming explanation can paradoxically work to render the far right distant and divorced from the everyday structures of the nation even as it attempts to account for the presence of the former in the latter. This is because even critical appraisals of the mainstreaming phenomenon, which generally examine not only the role of the far right, but that of the mainstream as well, can nevertheless unintentionally produce the two as distinct and separable entities. Indeed, this is conveyed implicitly by the very term ‘mainstreaming’ itself, insofar as its verb form denotes a process through which one distinct thing comes to influence and/or inhabit another (regardless of which is to ‘blame’, and to what extent).
 
I argue that when researchers of the far right ontologize the far right and mainstream in this way, they run the risk of not only failing to see, but of actively obscuring how the underlying structures of the liberal west have not only allowed far right phenomena to thrive, but have produced them. Thus, although generally well intentioned, I argue such accounts can produce a politics of innocence that covertly purifies the mainstream by portraying the far right as something that originates outside of the ‘centre’ of society, and has supposedly only now come to pervert it. In essence, such readings posit an anterior scene when ‘the far right’ wasn’t always already proximate.
 
My argument, therefore, is that through its very attempt to explain how far-right violence has become un-exceptional, the mainstreaming explanation can paradoxically exceptionalize far-right violence by portraying it as a deviation from, or aberration to, the liberal societies from within which it is understood as merely occurring, rather than originating.
 
To unpack this argument, I draw from the frameworks of ‘reactionary democracy’ (Aurelien Mondon and Aaron Winter), the ‘racial contract’ (Charles W. Mills), and ‘white reconstruction’ (Dylan Rodríguez). I argue that whereas liberal mythology typically attempts to minimize white supremacy by confining it to the past, as something society has supposedly already ‘overcome’, that by contrast, the mainstreaming explanation can work in an inverse way by instead confining white supremacy to the present, such as by depicting it as a ‘new’ problem that has supposedly only recently arisen.
 
I argue that to follow this line of thought, and diagnose white supremacy as entering the mainstream only with the return of figures like Donald Trump, Pauline Hanson, the Proud Boys, and so on, is to deny the larger and longer histories that have functioned as their conditions of possibility, and which can be traced back to the very formation and maintenance of the ‘liberal’ settings within which they have seemed to ‘emerge’.
 
My article concludes by considering its implications for those of us working in the field of ‘far-right studies’ (as loosely defined). If ‘the far right’ is not so far away at all, but rather, is and has always been proximate to the everyday structures of the liberal democratic nation, then we may need to reckon with the extent to which we ourselves are implicated, if indeed we are.
 
Acknowledgement:
The author thanks those who attended Criminology’s Barry Symposium at the University of Melbourne in 2023, where an earlier version of this article was presented. Thanks in particular to Sahar Ghumkhor for providing feedback on an earlier draft, and to the editor and reviewers for their generous insights.

Image credit: Photo by Colin Lloyd on Unsplash

Read the Identities article:
Gillespie, Liam. (2024). On the proximity of the far right and the misuses of the ‘mainstreaming’ metaphor. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2024.2442197   OPEN ACCESS
Picture
Read further in Identities:

Whiteness, populism and the racialisation of the working class in the United Kingdom and the United States
​
Post-homophobic imaginaries amongst the far-right in Germany and Switzerland

Rethinking ‘nativism’: beyond the ideational approach   OPEN ACCESS
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.



    Explore the 
    Identities Blog

    All
    Activism
    Anti Racism
    Anti-racism
    Asylum Seekers
    Belonging
    Black Lives Matter
    Blackness
    Borders
    Boundary Work
    Cities
    Citizenship
    Colonialism
    Commentaries
    Conflict
    Cosmopolitanism
    Covid-19
    Cultural Memory
    Culture
    Decoloniality
    Diaspora
    Discrimination
    Displacement
    Diversity
    Ethnic Boundaries
    Ethnic Identity
    Ethnicity
    Exile
    Far Right
    Gaza And Solidarity
    Gender
    Global South
    Identity
    Immigration
    Indigenous
    Integration
    Intersectionality
    Islamophobia
    Justice
    Kinship
    Marginalisation
    Migration
    Multiculturalism
    National Identity
    Nationalism
    Nationhood
    Nativism
    Othering
    Palestine
    Policing
    Populism
    Postcolonial
    Race
    Racial Identity
    Racialisation
    Racism
    Radicalism
    Refugees
    Religion
    Resistance
    Special Issues
    Sport
    State Racism
    Stereotyping
    Stigmatisation
    Subjectivity
    Transnationalism
    Victimhood
    Whiteness


    Blog Collection

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

Picture

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE

Bluesky: @identitiesjournal.bsky.social
The views and opinions expressed on The Identities Blog are solely those of the original blog post authors, and not of the journal, Taylor & Francis Group or the University of Glasgow.