Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • Contact

The exclusionary face of super-diversity

10/6/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Photographs by migrant workers of migrant workers on the streets of Singapore, InsideOut IV Exhibition, Objectifs Centre for Photography and Film, 2011 (Daniel P.S. Goh).
It was an improbable scene: I was using the photocopiers at the National Library in downtown Singapore, and a smartly dressed young man from Bangladesh walked in with a coffee table book featuring the city. We talked; he needed help to get a colour copy of a shot of the Singapore skyline. He wanted to send the picture back to his family, to tell them with pride he was here and helped build this great city. 

​It was improbable for him, a foreign worker, to be in the privileged space of the National Library and for I, a privileged citizen, to be chatting about life with him. But there it was. 
 
After all, Singapore is a multiracial nation. The Chinese make up three-quarters of the population, with Malays and Indians making the rest. Singapore is also a cosmopolitan global city. Citizens make up three-fifths of the population. A vibrant mix of migrants and resident workers from around the world – all highly skilled – leavens the economy of advanced manufacturing and services. They make the city more than multicultural: Singapore is super-diverse.
 
But, as I discuss in my Identities article, ‘Super-diversity and the bio-politics of migrant worker exclusion in Singapore’, there is another face to super-diversity.
 
The large majority of the remaining two-fifths of Singapore’s population are guest workers, most of them low-wage male workers from South Asia and female domestic workers from Southeast Asia. Over the years, the male foreign workers who build and clean the city have been pushed out from public housing estates where four-fifths of Singaporeans live. They are increasingly pushed into large dormitories situated in industrial areas and the margins of the city.
 
Space crunch in land-scarce Singapore meant that there were occasions foreign workers were temporarily housed near residential estates. This has provoked controversies, the most vivid of which involved the sitting of dormitories in disused public buildings such as old schools, close to upper middle-class landed estates. Amid worries that the presence of foreign workers in their neighbourhoods would affect property values and that the workers would fraternise with their female domestic workers, this conservative class of citizens rose in protest: ‘Not in my backyard!’
 
Unable to move the workers, the authorities responded to the tensions by building fences and organising citizen patrols to keep the foreign workers away from the estates as much as possible. Rules included the prohibition of wearing sarongs outside the dormitory, urinating in public, littering and being too noisy. Offenders were fined around a tenth of their salary.
 
Beyond the middle-class landed estates, large groups of foreign workers occupying town centres, and the common spaces of public housing estates in the evenings and Little India during the weekends, drew complaints from citizens. The government built regional recreational centres filled with eating places, grocery shops and sports facilities near dormitory clusters to try to draw the workers away from town centres.
 
The Little India riot in December 2013 catalysed the growing exclusion of foreign workers from the global city. Upset after an intoxicated worker was knocked down and killed by a bus that took the workers back to their dormitories, a few hundred workers attacked police and rescue personnel, and set emergency vehicles ablaze. The authorities became keenly aware of the danger of over a hundred thousand foreign workers packed into the downtown heritage precinct of Little India every weekend.
 
The authorities accelerated the building of mega-dormitories in outlying peri-urban areas with the capacity to house tens of thousands of foreign workers. They were to be well provided for. Mass kitchens, recreational facilities and shops catering to the needs of the resting workers meant they did not have to travel the long distance to Little India. More regional recreational centres were built, for those who still felt the need to travel out.
 
Indeed, defining and meeting needs became the key to exclude the foreign workers from the city and its super-diversity.  
Blog post by Daniel P.S. Goh, ​National University of Singapore, Singapore 

Read the full article: Goh, Daniel P.S. Super-diversity and the bio-politics of migrant worker exclusion in Singapore. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2018.1530899​ 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Adolescents
    African Caribbean Self Help Organisation (ACSHO)
    Anarchists Against The Wall
    Antiblackness
    Apartheid
    Arts
    Aspirations
    Assimilation
    Australia
    Belonging
    Biologisation
    Black Geographies
    Blackness
    Boundary Work
    Boxing
    British Muslims
    Canada
    Categories
    Causal Stories
    Children Of Immigrants
    Chinatown
    Chinese Community
    Chinese-Indonesian Women
    Citizenship
    Class
    Colonialism
    Context
    Cosmopolitanism
    Counter-mapping
    Critical Race Theory
    Cross-national Comparison
    Cultural Geography
    Cultural Policy
    Curfew
    Decolonial Solidarity
    Decolonisation
    Denial
    Deportation
    Discourse
    Discourse Analysis
    Diversity
    Elite Students
    Emotion
    Employment
    Epistemology
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity And The City
    Ethnic Labelling
    Ethnic Niche
    Europe
    Exile
    Family
    Fandom
    Far Right
    Filipina
    Filipinos
    Fractal Logic
    France
    Fundamental British Values
    Gender
    Handsworth Epistemologies
    Historical Enquiry
    Hospitality
    Human Rights
    Identity
    Immigrants
    Immigration
    Inclusion
    India-Israel Relations
    Integration
    Interdisciplinary
    Interest Convergence
    Interviews
    Invisible Boundaries
    Islam
    Islamophobia
    Italy
    Jewishness
    Joint Struggle
    Kashmir
    Labour Agency
    Labour Market
    Labour Migration
    Language
    Laowai
    Law
    Liberalism
    Local Identity
    Masculinity
    Media
    Microaggression
    Middle Class
    Migrant Farm Workers
    Migrant Workers
    Migration
    Military Occupation
    Multiculturalism
    Nation
    National Identity
    Nation In Danger
    Neoliberalism
    Neonationalism
    NGOs
    Occidentalism
    Orientalism
    Othering
    Palestine
    Palestine Israel
    Palestine-Israel
    Place Branding
    Policy Analysis
    Political Subjectivity
    Politics
    Populism
    Post-apartheid
    Postcolonial Theory
    Precarious Status
    Public Inquiries
    Race
    Race-relations
    Racialisation
    Racialization
    Racism
    Refugees
    Riace
    Scientific Misconduct
    Securitization
    Self-identification
    Settler Colonialism
    Singapore
    Sixth Pan-African Congress
    Social Identity
    Solidarity
    South Africa
    State Power
    Stereotyping
    Stigma
    Stuart Hall
    Sweden
    Sydney
    Third Sector
    Turkey
    Urban Multiculturalism
    Vanley Burke
    Vulnerability
    Walking
    West Bank Separation Wall
    White Nationalism
    Whiteness
    White Sociology
    Worker Exit
    Working Class

    Archives

    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE