Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • Contact

Denmark’s blond vision of a nation in danger

10/6/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
If national security is in danger, the state can declare a state of emergency. This step will suspend normal legal procedures that allow the authorities to regain order and control.

What if politicians allege that the culture and identity of migrants and refugees are threatening the cultural cohesion and economic welfare of the nation-state? What if political leaders declare a national security emergency in order to get political support and funding for a wall?

In my Identities article, 'Denmark’s blond vision and the fractal logics of a nation in danger', I show a new way to understand neo-nationalism, which is the kind that occurs within established nation-states, through the notion of a ‘nation in danger’, in relation to racialisation. The notion of the nation in danger is a specific logic that motivates a large ‘white’ majority of Danes in their perception and treatment of migrants, refugees, asylum-seekers and Danes of colour. It also separates for them who belongs to Denmark and who does not on the basis of racial, cultural and ethnic features.

The problem with this dominant way of thinking is not the desire for self-determination itself, but the illusion that you can only be at home, and can only be understood, among people like yourself. This belief has now become predatory, a state of alertness that informs popular thinking and the rationale behind the competition among political parties and influencers.

Accordingly, eating pork; clothing; jewelry; language skills; physical presence; the right to speak; number of children; choice of public schools; freedom of religion; where to live and what to watch on television are some of the targets for regulation. The rhetoric points primarily to Muslim ways of living, but the net is cast widely for so-called non-Westerners regardless of whether they are newcomers or were born in Denmark with broader immigrant histories.

Such competition has revealed tensions between legal and moral demands. By making claims that would be unconstitutional if tested in court, parties dominate the conflict-prone news media coverage and contribute to further neo-nationalist, racialised recruitment of voters.

In 2006, my team researched the coverage of Islam peaking with the Danish Muhammad Cartoon affair in the Danish newspaper Jylland’s Posten. The conclusion was startling. In contrast with the era before political communication became an industry and commercial revenue shifted from newspapers to the internet, the public sphere was now no longer used for dialogue but had become a space for battle and confrontation.

​Spinning news is a weapon in a terrain where enemies are known and attacked. With the friend-foe philosophy of neo-conservative fathers Leo Strauss and Carl Schmitt, there is no limit to how far the uncompromising stance can go and how radical the language can become, since confrontation is sought and is, ultimately, the responsible way to do ‘the political’. The aim of such politics is the containment of the opponent at any price. This friend-foe scheme now forms the backbone of common-sense reasoning among the majority of the Danish voters. Accordingly, politicians go out of their way to please these voters because their political lives depend on them.  

The Danish Minister’s ‘restrictive identity policies’ on the official website is a neo-nationalist celebration of who belongs and who does not by creating separate rules, routines, and language for the two groups. The political demand for restrictive identity policies can never be fully satisfied, but the Danish People’s Party has insisted on them in political negotiations since 2001; the ruling government and opposition have adopted the measures.

Today, we can speak about an extreme right that has become mainstream, hence mainstream extremism or hegemonic majority that I contend is guided by the nation in danger logic. Politicians and most of the news media are nourishing the majority view. However, calls for a state of emergency do not apply to this majority or those who reach for arms and threats of violence. They are protected by free speech absolutists and the police. The enemy is still ‘Islamists’, who are seen as foreigners and approached as individual and collective life-threating foes.
Blog post by Peter Hervik, Aalborg University, Denmark

​
Read the full article: Hervik, Peter. Denmark’s blond vision and the fractal logics of a nation in danger​. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. 10.1080/1070289X.2019.1587905​
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Adolescents
    African Caribbean Self Help Organisation (ACSHO)
    Anarchists Against The Wall
    Antiblackness
    Apartheid
    Arts
    Aspirations
    Assimilation
    Australia
    Belonging
    Biologisation
    Black Geographies
    Blackness
    Boundary Work
    Boxing
    British Muslims
    Canada
    Categories
    Causal Stories
    Children Of Immigrants
    Chinatown
    Chinese Community
    Chinese-Indonesian Women
    Citizenship
    Class
    Colonialism
    Context
    Cosmopolitanism
    Counter-mapping
    Critical Race Theory
    Cross-national Comparison
    Cultural Geography
    Cultural Policy
    Curfew
    Decolonial Solidarity
    Decolonisation
    Denial
    Deportation
    Discourse
    Discourse Analysis
    Diversity
    Elite Students
    Emotion
    Employment
    Epistemology
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity And The City
    Ethnic Labelling
    Ethnic Niche
    Europe
    Exile
    Family
    Fandom
    Far Right
    Filipina
    Filipinos
    Fractal Logic
    France
    Fundamental British Values
    Gender
    Handsworth Epistemologies
    Historical Enquiry
    Hospitality
    Human Rights
    Identity
    Immigrants
    Immigration
    Inclusion
    India-Israel Relations
    Integration
    Interdisciplinary
    Interest Convergence
    Interviews
    Invisible Boundaries
    Islam
    Islamophobia
    Italy
    Jewishness
    Joint Struggle
    Kashmir
    Labour Agency
    Labour Market
    Labour Migration
    Language
    Laowai
    Law
    Liberalism
    Local Identity
    Masculinity
    Media
    Microaggression
    Middle Class
    Migrant Farm Workers
    Migrant Workers
    Migration
    Military Occupation
    Multiculturalism
    Nation
    National Identity
    Nation In Danger
    Neoliberalism
    Neonationalism
    NGOs
    Occidentalism
    Orientalism
    Othering
    Palestine
    Palestine Israel
    Palestine-Israel
    Place Branding
    Policy Analysis
    Political Subjectivity
    Politics
    Populism
    Post-apartheid
    Postcolonial Theory
    Precarious Status
    Public Inquiries
    Race
    Race-relations
    Racialisation
    Racialization
    Racism
    Refugees
    Riace
    Scientific Misconduct
    Securitization
    Self-identification
    Settler Colonialism
    Singapore
    Sixth Pan-African Congress
    Social Identity
    Solidarity
    South Africa
    State Power
    Stereotyping
    Stigma
    Stuart Hall
    Sweden
    Sydney
    Third Sector
    Turkey
    Urban Multiculturalism
    Vanley Burke
    Vulnerability
    Walking
    West Bank Separation Wall
    White Nationalism
    Whiteness
    White Sociology
    Worker Exit
    Working Class

    Archives

    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE