Identities Journal Blog
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • COVID-19 Symposium
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Identities
  • Blog Articles
  • COVID-19 Blog Series
    • Call for COVID-19 Commentaries
  • COVID-19 Symposium
  • Contact

If migration researchers feel unsafe participating in the public debate, what are the consequences for debate – and research?

17/6/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
I was just out of the TV studio after having finished an interview about a new book about social cohesion and migration that I had edited together with two colleagues. The interview went well, I was tired, it was late and I wanted to get home to sleep. Standing in the lobby of the Danish National Broadcasting Company I checked my email on my smartphone. I could see the headings of all new incoming emails, and the first of these included just one word: 'Liar'.

The email related to the interview that I had just carried out. At least this person had signed his email with a name that seemed to exist. Someone whom, when I looked him up, participated in discussions on the website of one of Scandinavia’s most radical right-wing organisations. In other instances, where someone – who disagreed beyond strongly with my research results - has sent me an email or even paper letters, there has not been any signature. Just a strong message of ‘you are wrong’.

I am not alone in having these kinds of experiences. In the spring of 2018 I carried out a survey among migration researchers in four Danish universities. The results of the survey are discussed in my Identities article, 'Boundary work: investigating the expert role of Danish migration researchers'. The survey focused on the researchers’ experience with participating in the public debate and experiences in that regard. The survey showed that Danish migration researchers were active participants in the public debate, for example by answering questions from news reporters, communicating research via TV and radio programmes, and writing articles for newspapers. Many researchers saw these activities as their duty; it was a way of contributing to a society that paid for their salary and which they wanted to keep informed and knowledgeable.

Participating in the debate, however, was far from easy. One researcher, to give one example, noted that: 'I have only rarely participated in the debate, and I feel that reporters very often have a story they want confirmed. If you do not confirm this story, I have on several occasions found that [the reporters] twist the story, which has unpleasant consequences for the people that I work with'. Another researcher noted that he/she felt 'burdened' by the public debate, and would rather spend his/her time writing academic articles where he/she could make a difference. And a third researcher noted that he/she was constantly afraid of having his/her research results misused and misinterpreted by journalists and politicians.

One may ask: but is this simply not the name of the game? If you as a researcher choose to work in a highly politicised research field, is someone calling you an idiot or a reporter misrepresenting something you said on a telephone not just something that you must live with – and eventually be thankful for? Is it not actually something that pulls research out of the ivory tower? And is a harsh tone not simply the tone of public debates in our times?

No respondents in the survey of Danish migration researchers had experienced being attacked physically in relation to their work. But a number had experienced threats and verbal abuse. More than half of the respondents felt unsafe participating in the public debate. The pertinent question here is: What are the results of feeling unsafe for researchers’ willingness to participate in public debates? Do researchers hold back certain aspects of their research or do they refrain from participating in the public debate, even when they have research results that are highly relevant? What is the effect on the debate? And what is the effect on research?

As a researcher, I will argue that we need to focus seriously on this problematic issue. And we need to gear our research institutions to handle and help their employees in this situation. As one respondent noted: 'Universities’ HR [human resources] workers are not aware of the problem, and they are not trained to handle it'.
Blog post by Garbi Schmidt, Roskilde University, Denmark

Read the full article: Schmidt, Garbi. Boundary work: investigating the expert role of Danish migration researchers. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2020.1748347​
0 Comments

    Blog Collection

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

    Blog Categories

    All
    Academic Freedom
    Activism
    Adolescents
    Adoption
    Affective Solidarity
    Affirmative Action
    African-American
    African Caribbean Self Help Organisation (ACSHO)
    African Diaspora
    AKP
    Aleviness
    Alternative Epistemologies
    Alternative Futures
    Anarchists Against The Wall
    Anthropology
    Antiblackness
    Anti-racism
    Apartheid
    Archives
    Armenians
    Arts
    Aspirations
    Assimilation
    Asylum Seekers
    Australia
    BAME
    Becoming
    Belonging
    Biographical Trajectories
    Biologisation
    Black
    Black Geographies
    Blackness
    Body
    Bosnia-Herzegovina
    Boundary Work
    Boxing
    Brazil
    British Muslims
    Bushfalling
    Cameroon
    Canada
    Capital
    Capitalism
    Caregiver
    Categories
    Causal Stories
    Central Americans
    Chernobyl
    Children
    Children Of Immigrants
    China
    Chinatown
    Chinese Community
    Chinese Immigrants
    Chinese-Indonesian Women
    Citizenship
    Class
    CLR James
    Cognitive Justice
    Colombia
    Colonial
    Colonialism
    Commemoration
    Competitive
    Conflict
    Containment
    Context
    Cosmologies
    Cosmopolitanism
    Counter-mapping
    COVID-19
    Creole
    Critical Race Theory
    Cross-border Marriage
    Cross-national Comparison
    Cultural Geography
    Cultural Policy
    Cultural Scripts
    Cultural Studies
    Cultural Toolkit
    Culture Of Migration
    Curfew
    Decolonial Solidarity
    Decolonisation
    Denial
    Denmark
    Deportation
    Diaspora
    Digital
    Disaster
    Discourse
    Discourse Analysis
    Discrimination
    Displacement
    Diversity
    Divorce
    Domari
    Domestic Violence
    East Jerusalem
    Eating
    Educational Mobility
    Elite Students
    Emotion
    Employment
    Epistemology
    Ethnic Boundaries
    Ethnic Classification
    Ethnic Identity
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity And The City
    Ethnicization
    Ethnic Labelling
    Ethnic Minority
    Ethnic Niche
    Ethnic Websites
    Ethnoracial
    Ethnoracial Identity
    Europe
    European Capital Of Culture
    Exile
    Expatriates
    Experiential Knowledge
    Expert Role
    Explicit Normativity
    Exploitation
    Expropriation
    Faith Identities
    Family
    Fandom
    Far Right
    Favela
    Filipina
    Filipino
    Filipinos
    Flanders
    Food
    Football
    Fractal Logic
    France
    Fundamental British Values
    Gender
    Global Neo-colonialism
    ‘gün’ Groups
    Gypsy
    Handsworth Epistemologies
    Hauntology
    Hegemony
    Henri Lefebvre
    Higher Education
    Historical Enquiry
    Hmong
    Hong Kong
    Hospitality
    Humanism
    Humanitarianism
    Human Rights
    Hybridity
    Identification
    Identity
    Ideology
    Imaginaries
    Immigrants
    Immigration
    Immobility
    Impact
    Imperialism
    Implicit Normativity
    Inclusion
    Incorporation
    India Israel Relations
    India-Israel Relations
    Indigenous
    Indonesian Women
    Institutions
    Integration
    Intercultural Communication
    Interdisciplinary
    Interest Convergence
    Intermarriage
    Intermarriages
    International Marriage
    Intersectionality
    Interviews
    Intimate Citizenship
    Invisible Boundaries
    Ireland
    Islam
    Islamophobia
    Italy
    Japan
    Jewishness
    Joint Struggle
    Journeys
    Justice
    Kashmir
    Kinning
    Kinship
    Knowledge
    Knowledge Production
    Korea
    Labour Agency
    Labour Market
    Labour Migration
    Language
    Laowai
    Latin America
    Latinos
    Law
    Legal Discourse
    Liberalism
    Local Identity
    Los Angeles
    Mapuche
    Mariana Islands
    Marriage
    Marriage Migration
    Marseille
    Marxism
    Masculinity
    Media
    Mental Health Services
    Microaggression
    Micronesia
    Middle Class
    Migrant Entrepreneurs
    Migrant Farm Workers
    Migrants
    Migrant Women
    Migrant Workers
    Migration
    Migration Research
    Military Occupation
    Mixed-ethnicity
    Moralities
    Motherhood
    Movement
    Multicultural
    Multiculturalism
    Multiethnic
    Muslim
    Narrative
    Narratives
    Nation
    National Identity
    Nation In Danger
    Nation-state
    Neighbourhood Arts
    Neoliberalism
    Neonationalism
    NGOs
    Nicaragua
    Nigeria
    Nigerian Identities
    Non-governmental Organisations
    Normativity
    Northern Mariana Islands
    Norway
    Nostalgia
    Occidentalism
    Okinawa
    Orientalism
    Othering
    Palestine
    Palestine Israel
    Palestine-Israel
    Parenting
    Peace
    Performativity
    Place
    Place Branding
    Place-making
    Poetry
    Poland
    Policy
    Policy Analysis
    Political Subjectivity
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Populism
    Post-apartheid
    Postcolonial
    Postcolonial Theory
    Post-war
    Power
    Precarious Status
    Protests
    Public Inquiries
    Public Sociology
    Race
    Race-relations
    Racial Capitalism
    Racial Identity
    Racialisation
    Racialization
    Racial Schemas
    Racism
    Reconciliation
    Refugees
    Religion
    Remittances
    Representations
    Research
    Research Communication
    Research-policy Nexus
    Riace
    Rights Claims
    Role Identity
    Russian Women
    Science Studies
    Scientific Misconduct
    Second-generation
    Securitization
    Self-identification
    Self-victimisation
    Settler Colonialism
    Shame
    Silence
    Singapore
    Sixth Pan-African Congress
    Social Contact
    Social Exclusion
    Social Identity
    Social Relations
    Social Space
    Solidarity
    South Africa
    Sports
    State
    State Power
    State Racism
    Stereotyping
    Stigma
    Stuart Hall
    Student-worker
    Subjectivity
    Sunniness
    Sweden
    Sydney
    Syrian Refugees
    Temporality
    Third Sector
    Third Sector Organisations
    Threat Perception
    Transculturalism
    Transnationalism
    Transnational Racialization
    Travel
    Turkey
    Turks
    Uprising
    Urban Ethnography
    Urban Multiculturalism
    Urban Space
    Vanley Burke
    Victimhood
    Vulnerability
    Walking
    West Bank Separation Wall
    White Nationalism
    Whiteness
    White Sociology
    Women
    Words
    Worker Exit
    Working Class
    Youth

Explore Identities at tandfonline.com/GIDE